1. Why was important to show the You tube clips of fights recorded at schools? 2. The Student Press Law Center source makes it clear students always own their cell phone video footage. How do your school administrators handle this? 3. What are some alternative ways to conduct the interview with the SPLC lawyer other than over the phone? 4. What was the point made by the second stand-up, and how did it relate to the focus of the story? 5. Cite examples of how this story practiced the journalistic concept of “say it, prove it.”
1. It is important because it shows proof that there are actually students who don’t care about others and want other people to see the students beating up on each other.
2. I’m not exactly sure on how the administrators run things here because I've never been in that position, but I do know that my old school runs things very strictly about video recording a fight and uploading it.
3. Some alternative methods could be video messaging like Skype, or meet in person for a 1 on 1 interview.
4. The point was to show the process of how a video is taken or recorded to a phone, and then uploaded to the internet. It related to the focus of the story because the whole news video is about whether or not students should have or not have the right to record and upload videos of other student to the internet without punishments for their actions.
5. She said that students in many schools were uploading videos of fights, and then she showed a video of a fight.
No comments:
Post a Comment